Skip to main content

Independence Day

Independence Day


Maybe it is just me, but the recent unrest about the systemic racism still afflicting our country and the dearth of mass celebrations brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, have inspired a more introspective view of Independence Day.  

We don’t think enough about it, but we aren’t celebrating the day our country was founded, our flag adopted, our Constitution written, or even our independence won.  We are celebrating the day the Declaration of Independence was adopted

Most of the Declaration is devoted to giving reasons why the colonies felt justified in dissolving our “political bands” with Great Britain.  However, the reasons are given in a philosophical context that is remarkable. At a time when most countries were ruled by people who claimed to do it by divine right, or simply did it by force, our Declaration set out a statement of purpose and justification: 

that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. 

Today we attack the members of the Constitutional Convention for being slave holders, for excluding women, for supporting genocide against native people.  Maybe for them it was self-evident that “all men” actually meant “all white property-owning men,” but because they wrote and approved “all men” we have foundational grounds for working toward a fair and just society.  
You know, after stating that we have unalienable rights and identifying “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” as three of them, the Declaration says, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”  Everything after that is just working out the details.

Among those details, to me, right now: it makes sense that we should take down, modify, even destroy statues and monuments to men who led armies against the United States in support of slavery (I wrote about statues in a previous post).  I find it a little more problematic to destroy or defile a statue that was created to honor some other achievement, but happens to portray a man who owned slaves or massacred Native Americans.  

But on the Fourth of July we aren’t celebrating the men or their deeds, we are celebrating their words, their ideas. 

All are equal. 

All have unalienable rights.

Among the rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The purpose of governments is to secure the rights of the governed.

Governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed.  If those problematic white men of privilege had not pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to the ideals where would we be?

No country was ever founded on those ideals before, and they are ideals worth celebrating, and worth continuing to strive toward.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Racial Injustice: The Case of Walter Lett Inspired Harper Lee

Chronology: The case of Walter Lett influenced Harper Lee in writing To Kill a Mockingbird. Here are the events of the case, and its connection to Harper Lee. The case began in November 1933.  "On Thursday, November 9, 1933, the Monroeville Journal reported that Noami Lowery told authorities that Walter Lett had raped her the previous Thursday.” ( "Lee, Harper: 1926 - 2016").  Just as in To Kill a Mockingbird , the accusation alone was enough for most citizens to assume guilt.  Writing for Time magazine, Daniel Levy asserts,   “Such an accusation was a death sentence for an African American man. ‘Rape was the central drama of the white psyche,’ says Diane McWhorter, author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama: The Climactic Battle of the Civil Rights Revolution.”   Lett was captured on Saturday and jailed in another town out of fear he’d be lynched. The legal system operated quickly. “On March 16, 1934, Lett was arraigned ...

Pease Air Show - Wings of Hope

I'm getting excited about the Wings of Hope show, and thought that, even though it is nominally off-topic, I wanted to blog about it. First, here's the web address: http://www.peaseairshow.com/ And here's the schedule: 9:00-11:00 Civilian Air Craft Rides (limited) 11:00 Opening Ceremonies (Saturday Only) 11:35 Flag Drop "Silver Wings" US Army Jump Team 11:45 American Air Power B-25, P-40, P47, TBM Avenger Noon Jet Car and Rob Holland Act 12:15 L-39 Demonstration - Dan McCue 12:30 Red Star Formation Team 12:45 B-2 Flyover (August 18th Only!) 1:00 Carol Pilon Wing Walker (Rob Holland / Pilot) 1:30 Jim Parker Salto H101 Sailplane 1:45 F4U Corsair (Dan McCue / Pilot) 2:00 U.S. Navy F/A-18 Hornet Demo Team East 2:15 Legacy Formation / F-18/F4U 2:30 P-40 Warhawk Demonstration 2:45 NH Army Guard Helicopter Ground Assault Demo 3:00 Rob Holland Airshows / Ultimate 20-300s N8UB 3:15 Lockheed T-33 "Shooting Star" 3:30 F-86 Demonstration (Ed Shipley / Pilot) 3:45 U...

Anti-Wal-Mart essay

This isn't really the place for this, but I spent two+ hours writing it today, and I thought it might serve as thought-fodder and talking points for some other people. Why Not Shop at Wal-Mart? I felt it was wrong to shop at Wal-Mart, but when my thinking was challenged I realized the main reasons I had for it were that other people whose opinions I respect were anti-Wal-Mart, and it just seems too big. The too-big argument works a little bit; small and local is better in general than big and international. Udder Place preferred to Starbucks, Siano's or GLB to Applebee's or Ruby Tuesday, Geary's to A-B, etc. It's consistent with slow-food, locavore-type thinking. Even though Hannaford is owned by a multi-national conglomerate, they have a local distribution center, and buy produce from local suppliers, and contribute to local charities, and support local causes. Wal-Mart is the opposite. Still, I felt the need to research and articulate other reasons not to ...