I see a lot of people expressing outrage toward Rolling Stone for putting Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on the cover. I want to take a little room to say that people doing that are wrong . Some of those folks are suggesting that Boston first responders would have been more appropriate cover subjects; however, Rolling Stone' s cover story is about how Dzokhar became radicalized; it's an in-depth investigative piece about him, not a news report on the bombing itself. Given the subject of the story, it's appropriate for him to be on the cover. A cover showing first responders would have been misleading. Some might object that the story should have been about the first responders, but that story has been done. Many stories have been done about the heroic actions of police, bystanders, and others. This story is about one of the bombers, and Rolling Stone claims there are revelations about him in their story. I think there is an audienc...